The Basic Principles Of latest case laws on crpc
The Basic Principles Of latest case laws on crpc
Blog Article
Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, as well as case legislation at both the federal and state levels.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Compact fees use.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the learned counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession with the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this factor for interim custody of the topic premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The proposal seems to be reasonable and acceded to. From the meantime police shall remain neutral inside the private dispute between the parties, however, if any from the individuals is indulged in criminal exercise the police shall get prompt action against them under regulation. five. The instant petition is disposed of in the above terms. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically bring about exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. Even though a writ under Article 199 is accessible in specific limited situations, it really is generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't encourage the department of his/her innocence.
Should you find an error within the content of a published opinion (for instance a misspelled name or maybe a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
Only the written opinions in the Supreme Court and also the Court of Appeals are routinely out there. Decisions from the decrease (trial) courts will not be generally published or dispersed.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle founded by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions will be the opinions that are filed on the day that the appellate court issues its decision and are sometimes not the court's final opinion.
The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere to the tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision along with the statutes.[4]
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there can be one or more judgments offered (or reported). Only the reason for that decision with the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted in an argument.
Criminal cases During the common legislation tradition, courts decide the law applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Contrary to most civil law systems, common regulation systems Keep to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their personal previous decisions in similar get more info cases. According to stare decisis, all reduce courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.